Ciao Lilla,

Thank you so much for the quick answer. Sorry to bother you again but I've
got some other questions to ask.
First of all how have you managed to obtain reasonable recons with patients
of 3-4 years old? There is a pipeline or particular settings to follow and
if yes which ones? Then I would like to know if you can briefly summarise
the technical reasons on why Recon all is not working with young patient's
brain (in general for neonates and for babies from 3yr on);  I assume there
should be different reasons but it is more due to the low contrast between
gray and white matter or to the atlas used? The last question is about the
pipeline you are working on but not ready yet. It is somewhat linked to
this article I've found http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19936261? I
understand there are problems to do so, but there is a possibility to try
it now before the final release? I would be really glad to use it and make
few tests with it on my patients.
Thank you for the attention and for your time,

Francesco Baldacchini


2014-03-21 16:12 GMT+01:00 Lilla Zollei <lzol...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:

> Hi Francesco,
>
> Given that the recon pipeline is built on an adult atlas it is not
> expected to work for such young subjects. In the past, with high quality
> images, we managed to get reasonable recons for ages down to 4 (or
> sometimes 3). For the younger population though it will not work. We are in
> the process of creatig a pipeline for them, but it is not yet ready for
> distribution.
>
> Lilla
>
>
>
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Francesco Baldacchini wrote:
>
>  Hi Lilla,
>>
>> They range from neonates to 6 years old,
>>
>> Francesco
>>
>>
>> 2014-03-19 19:21 GMT+01:00 Lilla Zollei <lzol...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
>>
>>       Hi Francesco,
>>
>>       How old are your subjects?
>>
>>       Lilla
>>
>>       On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, Francesco Baldacchini wrote:
>>
>>             I have some quality problems with my scans. I'm trying to run
>> recon-all on pediatric brain images but, given the low contrast between
>> cortical regions and the white matter, I do consistently get some problem
>> in the reconstruction of the cortical surface as well as of the
>> segmentation. I
>>             was wondering whether
>>             there is a tool making use of i.e. the T2 not only to improve
>> the surface (by the way I cannot see the -T2 option in the help of recon
>> -all to do so)  but particularly to improve the contrast of the T1. In a
>> nutshell, there is a way to increase quality and contrast by using T1
>> together
>>             with T2 weighted images
>>             during recon-all? Another question is how important it is to
>> use the mprage option in recon-all?  Thanks,
>>
>>             Francesco Baldacchini
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
>> is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>> e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
>> in error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
>> properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to