yes, fsaverage
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, yufeng huang wrote:

I want to do is map all the individual activation maps into a common
surface-based coordinate system. So I do not need to follow the process of
creating a registration template 
fromscratch(GW)(https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/SurfaceRegAndTemplate
s) to do the surface-based registration.
  1If I just use the ?h.sphere.reg which produce by recon-all. But I want to
know : Who is the average subject at this time. The fsaverage?
  2 So at this time all I need to do is using mri_surf2surf onto fsaverage
surface? Or I should using mri_vol2surf first and do the mri_surf2surf next?
Thanks very much!



2014-03-19 9:46 GMT-04:00 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
      Hi Yufeng

      if all you want to do is map all the individual activation maps
      into a common surface-based coordinate system,then there is no
      need to create your own atlas and rerun the registration - just
      use the ?h.sphere.reg files.


      If there is some other reason you want to create your own
      template/atlas, then you can check the results by using
      make_average_subject to create a new version of fsavverage, and
      mapping each subject's curvature file into your new coordinate
      system using mri_surf2surf onto that average subject's surface.
      Then see if they align. You don't need to do anything about the
      inflated or other surfaces. Use mri_vol2surf to map the data
      onto each individual subject's surface, then mri_surf2surf with
      your new registration file to map it to your new average
      subject.

      cheers
      Bruce


      On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, yufeng huang wrote:

            Dear Burce,
               I have 20 normal subjects, and I want to do
            inter-subject surface-based
            registration to all of them. So each one's surface
            can align properly to the
            other subject’s surface. After that I can put the
            functional data onto the
            surface which has aligned to each other already.
              And now I followed the process of creating a
            registration 
templatefromscratch(GW)(https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/SurfaceRegAndTemp
            late
            s) to do the surface-based registration.  Round 1,
            all reference subjects
            data are registered to the initial template,
            producing ?h.sphere.myreg0.
            (I've coordinated the suffix numbers with the
            template used to produce the
            registration.) Using that registration, a new
            template (mytemp1.tif) is made
            using all reference subjects as input. Round 2 is
            essentially a repeat of
            Round 1, but produces an improved template
            (mytemp2.tif) because Round 2's
            initial registration step is based on a better
            template than in Round 1.
              I get the lh.sphere.reg.newtemplate1 and
            rh.sphere.reg.newtemplate1 in
            each subjects's surf folder. I do not know how to
            check the result about if
            every subject has aligned to each other properly.
            And I do not know what
            should I do next.
              My question is :
            1 How can I check about the result as if every one
            has aligned each other
            properly?
            2 And what should I do next, I can not know if the
            functional data can
            aligned to the new surface properly. If I can use
            mri_surf2surf or
            mri_vol2surf can be used for this.
            3 The lh.sphere.reg.newtemplate1 and
            rh.sphere.reg.newtemplate1is just for
            sphere, and  how about the inflate aligned  to each
            other?
               Yours Yufeng




The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to