you are doing it the right way. There is no difference in the uncorrected analysis. There will be a difference when you correct for multiple comparisons doug
On 03/14/2014 11:15 AM, amirhossein manzouri wrote: > Dear Experts, > I have read the previous posts in the list regarding restricted ROI > analysis. So I generated my label from tksurfer and used that for > group difference analysis by adding --label to mri_glmfit, but the > result (sig.mgh) seems just a masked version of the analysis including > whole brain ( no difference in significance! ). I expected to see a > different pattern of significance by limiting the region. Would you > please advise if I am doing this in a right way? > > Best regards, > Amirhossein Manzouri > > -- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/ _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
