Sorry for not being clear. I meant how to calculate path length based
on path.pd.nii.gz, and the Center and Weight Average of the scalar
images?
Thanks.

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Anastasia Yendiki
<ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi Ping - Are you asking how you can produced the stats? You could use
> fslstats with path.pd.nii.gz as the mask, and redirect the outputs to a file
> that looks like pathstats.overall.txt. You could either keep the same names
> for the measures or edit the tractstats2table script to change the names
> that it allows. Hope I answered your questions.
>
> a.y
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012, Ping-Hong Yeh wrote:
>
>> Hi Anastasia,
>>
>>  Thank you the answers.
>> One more question, if I'd like to use the scalar images created by
>> other methods, e.g. non-linear fitting, how can I feed this images to
>> output the stats like the pathstats? I knew the "tractstats2table"
>> will do the jobs, but it is binarized and hard-coded.
>>
>> ping
>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Anastasia Yendiki
>> <ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Ping - The total number of paths that were sampled doesn't enter the
>>> picture. Of these sampled paths, some get rejected and some get accepted.
>>> The latter are added up to get an estimate of the posterior probability
>>> distribution of the path (that's path.pd.nii.gz). You can normalize to a
>>> total sum of 1 by diving that volume with its total sum.
>>>
>>> The default threshold is 20% of the maximum value, to get rid of the
>>> tails
>>> of the distribution (which would need more total samples to converge than
>>> the center of the distribution anyway). You can of course find your own
>>> averages at a different threshold from path.pd.nii.gz if you wish.
>>>
>>> Hope this helps,
>>> a.y
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Ping-Hong Yeh wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Anastasia,
>>>> Just follow up on this thread..
>>>> If 5000 samples were used for each voxel, how can I normalize the
>>>> intensity of path.pd volumes to a sum of 1 ?
>>>> Also what thresholding value was chosen to calculate the tract volume,
>>>> shown in the pathstats.overall.txt ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> ping
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Anastasia Yendiki
>>>> <ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jon - The path.pd volumes are indeed the posterior probability
>>>>> distributions of each pathway. They are not normalized to a sum of 1
>>>>> though b/c they're estimated by a sampling algorithm (drawing sample
>>>>> paths
>>>>> from this unknown distribution and adding up the sample paths, instead
>>>>> of
>>>>> estimating the distribution directly).
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope this helps,
>>>>> a.y
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 9 Nov 2012, Jon Clayden wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>> I understand that the various "path.pd" image files that are created
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> TRACULA represent a posterior
>>>>>> distribution over the corresponding tract location, but I was
>>>>>> wondering
>>>>>> if someone could explain to me
>>>>>> exactly what the values in these images mean. I assume that they are
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> probabilities as such, since they
>>>>>> have values ranging up to several hundreds.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
>>>>> it
>>>>> is
>>>>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>>>>> e-mail
>>>>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>>>>> HelpLine at
>>>>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
>>>>> in
>>>>> error
>>>>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
>>>>> properly
>>>>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to