Hi Martin,

lot's of small changes can make a big change but from your phrasing i
assume this isn't the case. what has changed? i would like to have the new
(long_mris_slope) script.

thanks,
-joost


On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Martin Reuter
<mreu...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>wrote:

> Hi Yolanda,
>
> take a look at the longitudinal tutorial:
> http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/LongitudinalTutorial
>
> There is a section that hints at the post-processing as far as we have
> implemented it. Based on a longitudinal qdec table you can run
> long_mris_slopes to create rate or percent change maps for each subject
> and then run qdec on these for the cross sectional comparison.
>
> Also I can make available a newer version of that script as lots of
> small things have changed since last year, let me know.
>
> Best, Martin
>
>
> On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 15:58 +0200, Yolanda Vives wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > I would like to compare also a Control vs. an Experimental group
> > (pre-post), but instead of using ROIs, I am interested in a
> > whole-brain paired t-test analysis between the two groups. Which data
> > should I take? Would it be possible to process ?.long.base with qcache
> > and take the "rh.thickness.fwhm20.fsaverage.mgh" files? Or maybe could
> > I use QDEC with ?.long.base after qcache?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Yolanda
> >
> > 2012/4/12 Martin Reuter <mreu...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >         Yes, just extract the stats on each time point as done in a
> >         cross
> >         sectional analysis (but instead on the ?.long.base
> >         directories) do a
> >         paired t (or a t on the difference) to see if there is
> >         increase or
> >         decrease.
> >
> >         If you look at one of the reported ROI's (e.g. caudate volume,
> >         or
> >         pre-central thickness) you can directly get the values from
> >         the stats
> >         files. If you have your own ROI's you need to use segstats to
> >         get the
> >         stats for them.
> >
> >         Cheers, Martin
> >
> >         On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 19:19 +0200, Dídac Vidal wrote:
> >         > Hi everybody,
> >         > I have a question about FS longitudinal post-processing.
> >         Currently I
> >         > obtained some corrected results comparing a Control vs. an
> >         > Experimental group (pre-post).
> >         > What i would like to know is if there's a thinning in the
> >         control
> >         > group or a increase in the thickness of the experimental
> >         group.
> >         > I tought in create a label and extract the individual values
> >         of both
> >         > timepoints and then do a t test in order to see if the mean
> >         differs to
> >         > 0.
> >         > How I can do that?; There is an easier way to do it?
> >         > Thanks in advance
> >         >
> >         > --
> >         > Dídac Vidal Piñeiro
> >         >
> >         > Dept. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology
> >         > Faculty of Medicine
> >         > University of barcelona
> >         >
> >         >
> >
> >         > _______________________________________________
> >         > Freesurfer mailing list
> >         > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >         > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         Freesurfer mailing list
> >         Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >         https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >
> >
> >         The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person
> >         to whom it is
> >         addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error
> >         and the e-mail
> >         contains patient information, please contact the Partners
> >         Compliance HelpLine at
> >         http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was
> >         sent to you in error
> >         but does not contain patient information, please contact the
> >         sender and properly
> >         dispose of the e-mail.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to