You can edit the label by hand to only include one vertex. If you got the label from a call to mri_surfcluster, then surfcluster will output a summary file with the max vertex in each cluster.
doug Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] wrote: > Thank you so much for your suggestion! > > Doug, is there a way to modify the mri_segstats command from before to > specify coordinates of a vertex (say the peak from the ROI in my contrast)? > > Thanks! > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Harms [mailto:mha...@conte.wustl.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 2:41 PM > To: Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] > Cc: Doug Greve; Freesurfer Mailing List > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Interpreting results from Qdec > > > Hi Gallen, > I suggest that you extract the values across subjects at a single vertex > in fsaverage space, and then attempt to duplicate FS's uncorrected t- > and p-values at that vertex with your SPSS model. Those HAVE to be > identical if you are truly using the same model (unless there is an > unknown bug related to GLM statistics in FS, which I think it quite > unlikely). I vaguely recall myself doing something similar at some > point (but using SAS instead of SPSS), and the results were indeed the > same. But you really need to understand the underlying model used by > both FS and in your case SPSS. > > Best, > -MH > > On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 13:57 -0400, Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] > wrote: > >> Thanks for the reply! >> I'm fairly certain that I'm using the same model. In Qdec: 2 discrete >> variables, 1 nuisance variable. In SPSS: a univariate ANOVA with 2 factors >> and 1 covariate. >> >> I understand the difference between Qdec and SPSS may be because Qdec looks >> at the entire cortex. Are there any realistic ways to work around this using >> something like SPSS? >> >> All I really want is to generate a figure with means for each of my groups, >> so I can understand what's driving the interaction. Any other suggestions >> about how to do so? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] >> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 9:06 AM >> To: Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] >> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Interpreting results from Qdec >> >> Hi Courtney, >> >> a couple of suggestions: >> 1. make sure that QDEC and SPSS are using the identical model. >> 2. make sure that the values that you are extracting the same as the >> input to QDEC/glmfit (eg, don't use thickness for one and volume for >> another). >> >> It is possible for the ROI analysis to give very different results, but it >> usually requires that you select the voxels based on an unsigned statistic >> (eg, an F-test). This opens the possibility that positives and negatives >> in the ROI sum to 0. >> >> doug >> >> >> >>> Thanks Jesse. This does sound very similar to my issue. >>> >>> How did you resolve the problem? >>> >>> Thanks again! >>> >>> From: jessebled...@gmail.com [mailto:jessebled...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of >>> Jesse Bledsoe >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 1:19 PM >>> To: Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F]; Freesurfer Mailing List >>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Interpreting results from Qdec >>> >>> Hi Courtney, >>> >>> I'm no expert but I recalled a post similar to yours awhile ago with the >>> same question you ask. Doug and Nick offered an answer that may be of >>> help: >>> >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg15586.html >>> >>> Jesse >>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] >>> <galle...@nida.nih.gov<mailto:galle...@nida.nih.gov>> wrote: >>> Hi Doug >>> >>> Have a follow up question regarding significance levels in Qdec related to >>> extracting means from ROIs, etc. I'm posting to the entire mailing list in >>> case anyone else has ideas. >>> >>> Basically, I extracted mean volumes (from my set of participants) of ROIs >>> for which Qdec reports an interaction between two variables. I want to >>> look at these mean volumes in something like SPSS to see what is driving >>> the interaction/generate figures, etc. >>> >>> I'm having an issue with one such ROI, in that when I extract the mean >>> volumes and look for this interaction in SPSS, it is not significant (p ~ >>> 0.5, so really not significant at all). Is there any way that an ROI could >>> be significant in Qdec (p of 0.05, Monte Carlo sim), but not in SPSS when >>> I extract means for each participant? >>> >>> Let me know if this isn't clear. Any thoughts would be appreciated! >>> Courtney >>> >>> >>> Courtney Gallen >>> Post-baccalaureate IRTA >>> Neuroimaging Research Branch >>> National Institute on Drug Abuse (IRP) >>> 251 Bayview Blvd >>> Suite 200 >>> Baltimore, MD 21224 >>> Tel: (443) 740-2631<tel:%28443%29%20740-2631> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Douglas Greve >>> [mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>] >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 1:06 PM >>> To: Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] >>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Interpreting results from Qdec >>> >>> Those are the values outside (first column) and inside (2nd col) the >>> ROI. You can add "--id 1" to only report the values inside the ROI. >>> >>> doug >>> >>> On 4/26/11 1:02 PM, Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] wrote: >>> >>>> It worked! >>>> Now, last question. The txt file has two separate values (?averages). >>>> What do they each represent? >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Douglas Greve >>>> [mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 12:53 PM >>>> To: Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] >>>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Interpreting results from Qdec >>>> >>>> try "--slabel fsaverage lh ROI-drawn-on-QDEC-brain.label" >>>> >>>> >>>> On 4/26/11 12:52 PM, Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] wrote: >>>> >>>>> Actually, I hope I'm wrong about what I thought below. If I specify >>>>> individual subject's label and run: >>>>> >>>>> mri_segstats --in >>>>> /prot/Mprot/CTQ/freesurferDone/8579/surf/lh.volume.fwhm10.fsaverage.mgh >>>>> --slabel 8579 lh >>>>> /prot/Mprot/CTQ/freesurferDone/8579/label/lh.SupTemp_CTQxBDNFctrls.label >>>>> --avgwf lhSupTempctrls.txt >>>>> >>>>> I still get the same error about dimension mismatch >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 12:43 PM >>>>> To: 'Douglas Greve' >>>>> Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] Interpreting results from Qdec >>>>> >>>>> Ah I think I see the problem now. >>>>> >>>>> The label I originally specified is the general label created from the >>>>> ROI drawing in Qdec. Instead, I should use the individual subject's >>>>> label (from 'Map Label to Subjects') instead, right? >>>>> >>>>> Thank you! >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Douglas Greve >>>>> [mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>] >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 12:38 PM >>>>> To: Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] >>>>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Interpreting results from Qdec >>>>> >>>>> You have to use the subject that matches the input, fsaverage in this >>>>> case. How did you define your label? If you defined it on subject 123, >>>>> you can transfer it to fsaverage using mri_label2label. >>>>> doug >>>>> >>>>> On 4/26/11 12:28 PM, Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Not a problem at all! >>>>>> >>>>>> If I use --in, I get an error saying that there is a dimension >>>>>> mismatch between input volume and seg. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any other thoughts? Thanks again! >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Douglas Greve >>>>>> [mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>] >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 11:40 AM >>>>>> To: Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Interpreting results from Qdec >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Courtney, sorry for the delay. If more than a few days go by >>>>>> without >>>>>> a response, feel free to repost -- I promise not to get annoyed! >>>>>> Sometimes, things get pushed up and out of my mail browser window, and >>>>>> I >>>>>> often don't get back to them. Sorry! >>>>>> >>>>>> To answer your question, try using --in where you have --seg. The >>>>>> "segmentation" is actually already specified because you've specified >>>>>> a >>>>>> label. >>>>>> >>>>>> doug >>>>>> >>>>>> On 4/26/11 11:03 AM, Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Doug, >>>>>>> Sorry to keep bugging you but any thoughts about my response to your >>>>>>> e-mail from 2 weeks ago? I've given the exact command line I'm using >>>>>>> with mri_segstats. >>>>>>> Thanks again for all your help >>>>>>> Courtney >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:59 AM >>>>>>> To: 'Douglas N Greve' >>>>>>> Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] Interpreting results from Qdec >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That may be the problem. ${sub} is an actual person's directory >>>>>>> >>>>>>> E.g., sub# 123--command line would be: >>>>>>> mri_segstats --seg >>>>>>> /prot/Mprot/CTQ/freesurferDone/123/surf/lh.volume.fwhm10.fsaverage.mgh >>>>>>> --slabel 123 lh \ >>>>>>> lh.SupTemp_CTQxBDNFctrls.label --avgwf lhSupTempctrls.txt >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Douglas N Greve >>>>>>> [mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>] >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:55 AM >>>>>>> To: Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Interpreting results from Qdec >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What is your full command-line? Without variables, just something >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> you could put directly into the terminal. Make sure that you are >>>>>>> specifying fsaverage as your subject (can't tell below because your >>>>>>> use >>>>>>> ${sub}). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> doug >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry, but I can't seem to figure out how to specify input data. I >>>>>>>> tried '--in' but get an error that the input vol and seg label are >>>>>>>> not the same dimensions. I've been looking at the help options for >>>>>>>> mri_segstats (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/mri_segstats) >>>>>>>> but don't see it >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Douglas N Greve >>>>>>>> [mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>] >>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 10:38 AM >>>>>>>> To: Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Interpreting results from Qdec >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The lh.volume.fwhm10.fsaverage.mgh should be your input. It is not >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> segmentation. You've already specified the seg with the the --slabel >>>>>>>> command. >>>>>>>> doug >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> One last question (hopefully). I'm specifying the input volume with >>>>>>>>> --seg, but am getting an error ('cannot do frame average without >>>>>>>>> input volume'). Am I missing something obvious? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The entire command looks something like this: >>>>>>>>> mri_segstats --seg >>>>>>>>> /prot/Mprot/CTQ/freesurferDone/${sub}/surf/lh.volume.fwhm10.fsaverage.mgh >>>>>>>>> --slabel ${sub} lh \ >>>>>>>>> lh.SupTemp_CTQxBDNFctrls.label --avgwf lhSupTempctrls.txt >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks again >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>> From: Douglas N Greve >>>>>>>>> [mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>] >>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 4:21 PM >>>>>>>>> To: Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] >>>>>>>>> Cc: Nick Schmansky; Freesurfer Mailing List >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Interpreting results from Qdec >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> yes, something like ?h.volume.fwhm10.fsaverage.mgh >>>>>>>>> doug >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Doug >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for helping me with this! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> First time around I did everything as is outlined in 'Define a >>>>>>>>>> Region of Interest' here: >>>>>>>>>> http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/QdecGroupAnalysis. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'll try your suggestion now. The input data would be something >>>>>>>>>> like ?h.volume.fwhm10.fsaverage.mgh, correct? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks again >>>>>>>>>> Courtney >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>> From: Douglas N Greve >>>>>>>>>> [mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>] >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 5:44 PM >>>>>>>>>> To: Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] >>>>>>>>>> Cc: Nick Schmansky; Freesurfer Mailing List >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Interpreting results from Qdec >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Courtney, did you transfer the label to each individual subject >>>>>>>>>> using >>>>>>>>>> mri_label2label? A better way to replicate your qdec results is to >>>>>>>>>> run >>>>>>>>>> mri_segstats on the input data to qdec (y.mgh usually). Specify >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> label with "--slabel subject hemi yourlabel". Also specify >>>>>>>>>> "--avgwf >>>>>>>>>> subjectdata.txt". This will create this text file with a list of >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> input data for each subject averaged over your label. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> doug >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Nick >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm revisiting this issue and have a few more questions. First, I >>>>>>>>>>> have a significant interaction between two variables on cortical >>>>>>>>>>> volume. I drew a label on this ROI and ran mris_anatomical_stats >>>>>>>>>>> on the label (thank you for that suggestion). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> For stats in the output table file, is the column 'GrayVol' the >>>>>>>>>>> same thing as the cortical volume I looked at in Qdec? I'm asking >>>>>>>>>>> because when I export GrayVol values into SPSS, there is no >>>>>>>>>>> longer a significant interaction between my variables (and if >>>>>>>>>>> this ROI is significant after multiple comparisons across the >>>>>>>>>>> brain, I'd expect the mean volume from the ROI to be very >>>>>>>>>>> significant in SPSS). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if my questions aren't clear. Thanks in >>>>>>>>>>> advance >>>>>>>>>>> Courtney >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Courtney Gallen >>>>>>>>>>> Post-baccalaureate IRTA >>>>>>>>>>> Neuroimaging Research Branch >>>>>>>>>>> National Institute on Drug Abuse (IRP) >>>>>>>>>>> 251 Bayview Blvd >>>>>>>>>>> Suite 200 >>>>>>>>>>> Baltimore, MD 21224 >>>>>>>>>>> Tel: (443) 740-2631<tel:%28443%29%20740-2631> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>>> From: Nick Schmansky >>>>>>>>>>> [mailto:ni...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:ni...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>] >>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 3:08 PM >>>>>>>>>>> To: Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] >>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Freesurfer Mailing List >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Interpreting results from Qdec >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Courtney, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> if i understand your question, i think one way to do that is to >>>>>>>>>>> use qdec >>>>>>>>>>> to draw a label on the blob of interest, and the run 'map label >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> subjects', which creates a label file in each subjects label dir, >>>>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>>>> you can run stats on that with mris_anatomical_stats. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> (btw, i'm putting this answer on the list, as others may have >>>>>>>>>>> better >>>>>>>>>>> ideas.) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> n. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 16:38 -0500, Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) >>>>>>>>>>> [F] >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Nick >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the prompt reply. Sorry if my questions seem a bit >>>>>>>>>>>> naïve--this is my first time using Freesurfer. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A follow up question to your answer for question 1. I see that >>>>>>>>>>>> the group data will be plotted in Qdec for significant blobs, >>>>>>>>>>>> but say there is a significant interaction between two variables >>>>>>>>>>>> and it's not entirely apparent what is driving this interaction. >>>>>>>>>>>> Is there a way to extract the mean of this blob for each >>>>>>>>>>>> individual (i.e., treat it as an ROI or something similar) to >>>>>>>>>>>> determine what's driving the significance? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance! >>>>>>>>>>>> Courtney >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Nick Schmansky >>>>>>>>>>>> [mailto:ni...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:ni...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>] >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:44 PM >>>>>>>>>>>> To: Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) [F] >>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: >>>>>>>>>>>> freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Interpreting results from Qdec >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ans. 1. - the easiest way is to Ctrl- left mouse click on a >>>>>>>>>>>> blob, and a >>>>>>>>>>>> plot of the data at that surface vertex will appear. the group >>>>>>>>>>>> will be >>>>>>>>>>>> apparent from that (say, demented group is thinner than >>>>>>>>>>>> non-demented >>>>>>>>>>>> group). this data is significance data (log p, so '2' is 0.01), >>>>>>>>>>>> so mean >>>>>>>>>>>> and stdev wouldnt apply in that case. the file 'y.mgh' is the >>>>>>>>>>>> raw data >>>>>>>>>>>> of all subjects in the analysis, so you could extract mean and >>>>>>>>>>>> stdev >>>>>>>>>>>> from that. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ans. 2. - slide the 'annotation' opacity slider to show the >>>>>>>>>>>> annotation >>>>>>>>>>>> data (cortical parcellation). the ctrl left click will also put >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> region info for that vertex on the lower left of the display. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> see also: >>>>>>>>>>>> http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/QdecGroupAnalysis >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> n. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 10:49 -0500, Gallen, Courtney (NIH/NIDA) >>>>>>>>>>>> [F] >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm currently running analyses in Qdec and have identified >>>>>>>>>>>>> areas that >>>>>>>>>>>>> show significant effects in my contrasts. I have two questions >>>>>>>>>>>>> related >>>>>>>>>>>>> to interpreting these results. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. How can you interpret the effect in each "blob?" (i.e., >>>>>>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>>>>> group has a greater cortical surface area, etc.). Right now, >>>>>>>>>>>>> all I >>>>>>>>>>>>> know is that there is an effect in certain areas. Can you >>>>>>>>>>>>> export this >>>>>>>>>>>>> data to get means and standard errors? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Is there a way to localize where these effects are? >>>>>>>>>>>>> E.g., a >>>>>>>>>>>>> tool that tells you this effect is located in __ area of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> brain? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Courtney >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Courtney Gallen >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Post-baccalaureate IRTA >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Neuroimaging Research Branch >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> National Institute on Drug Abuse (IRP) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 251 Bayview Blvd >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 200 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Baltimore, MD 21224 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tel: (443) 740-2631<tel:%28443%29%20740-2631> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person >>>>>>>>>>>> to whom it is >>>>>>>>>>>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error >>>>>>>>>>>> and the e-mail >>>>>>>>>>>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners >>>>>>>>>>>> Compliance HelpLine at >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent >>>>>>>>>>>> to you in error >>>>>>>>>>>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the >>>>>>>>>>>> sender and properly >>>>>>>>>>>> dispose of the e-mail. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Freesurfer mailing list >>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jesse C. Bledsoe, M.A. >>> Ph.D. Candidate, Clinical Psychology >>> Consortium for Neurodevelopmental Study >>> Department of Psychology >>> 110E Psychology Building >>> Michigan State University >>> East Lansing, MI 48824 >>> ______________________________________ >>> >>> Note: Information contained in this electronic message and any attachments >>> to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and >>> may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you >>> are >>> not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy >>> this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies >>> of >>> this message and any attachments. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Freesurfer mailing list >>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >> > > > > -- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
