On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 07:47 +0100, Martin Babinsky wrote: > On 03/02/2017 02:54 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 08:10 +0100, Martin Babinsky wrote: > >> In this case it would probably be a good idea to think about "forward > >> compatibility" and define a new AUX objectclass bringing in > >> 'ipaDomainResolutionOrder' instead of extending two separate > >> objectclasses. In this way we may the just extend whathever object we > >> desire to carry the override in an easy and clean way. > > > > I agree. > > Simo. > > > > Now the most difficult question remains... How to name this objectclass. > I personally am out of ideas but will try my best to come up with > something meaningful.
Try to describe what the option ultimately does with as few words as possible. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code