On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 22:05 -0400, Adam Young wrote: > On 09/22/2011 08:31 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote: > >> OPEN QUESTION: should we implement these new commands also for discrete > >> DNS records types to be consistent? I mean for example A, AAAA, CNAME, > >> PTR, ... They would look like > >> > >>> ipa dnsrecord-aaaa-add --ip-address=IPAddress > >> > >> BENEFITS of this approach (command per RR type): > >> - use can get all help for RR type by simply typing "ipa help > >> dnsrecord-mx-add" > >> - we would be able to implement helper methods consistently on one > >> place, for example: > >> dnsrecord-aaaa-add --from-mac=00:1D:BA:06:37:64 > > > > If we have this for all record types the UI can use a generic code to > > figure out which command to use. Everything will be in this pattern: > > dnsrecord-<rrtype>-add/mod/del <primary keys> [parameters*] > > We won't have it for all types, so we will need a map. Most will use > the old API, and a few will use the pattern above
I think to make this all as consistent as possible, new API shall be implemented for all types (except unsupported and DNSSEC ones). Rob did agree with this approach too. Martin _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
