The SDM630 platform doesn't have DSC blocks nor does have it DSC
registers in the PINGPONG block. Drop the DPU_PINGPONG_DSC feature bit
from the PINGPONG's feature mask, replacing PINGPONG_SDM845_MASK with
BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DITHER).

Fixes: 7204df5e7e68 ("drm/msm/dpu: add support for SDM660 and SDM630 platforms")
Reported-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhin...@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>

---
Note, Konrad pointed out that vendor DT doesn't define DIPTHER support
for this platform, however I believe this is because support for this
platform predates DITHER support in the vendor kernels.
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_3_sdm630.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_3_sdm630.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_3_sdm630.h
index 
3aed9aa4c533f167ece7b4a5eb84fe49c4929df5..99c0f824d8f00474812bde12e7d83ba3de1834f1
 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_3_sdm630.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_3_sdm630.h
@@ -115,14 +115,14 @@ static const struct dpu_pingpong_cfg sdm630_pp[] = {
        {
                .name = "pingpong_0", .id = PINGPONG_0,
                .base = 0x70000, .len = 0xd4,
-               .features = PINGPONG_SDM845_MASK,
+               .features = BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DITHER),
                .sblk = &sdm845_pp_sblk,
                .intr_done = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 8),
                .intr_rdptr = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 12),
        }, {
                .name = "pingpong_2", .id = PINGPONG_2,
                .base = 0x71000, .len = 0xd4,
-               .features = PINGPONG_SDM845_MASK,
+               .features = BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DITHER),
                .sblk = &sdm845_pp_sblk,
                .intr_done = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 10),
                .intr_rdptr = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 14),

-- 
2.39.5

Reply via email to