On SDM670 the DPU has two DSPP blocks compared to 4 DSPP blocks on
SDM845. Currently SDM670 just reuses LMs and DSPPs from SDM845. Define
platform-specific configuration for those blocks.

Fixes: e140b7e496b7 ("drm/msm/dpu: Add hw revision 4.1 (SDM670)")
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhin...@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>
---
 .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_1_sdm670.h | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_1_sdm670.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_1_sdm670.h
index 
cbbdaebe357ec4a82a3c3d950aa13792a1fb2d6e..daef07924886a529ee30349ae80375a324bbc245
 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_1_sdm670.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_1_sdm670.h
@@ -65,6 +65,54 @@ static const struct dpu_sspp_cfg sdm670_sspp[] = {
        },
 };
 
+static const struct dpu_lm_cfg sdm670_lm[] = {
+       {
+               .name = "lm_0", .id = LM_0,
+               .base = 0x44000, .len = 0x320,
+               .features = MIXER_SDM845_MASK,
+               .sblk = &sdm845_lm_sblk,
+               .lm_pair = LM_1,
+               .pingpong = PINGPONG_0,
+               .dspp = DSPP_0,
+       }, {
+               .name = "lm_1", .id = LM_1,
+               .base = 0x45000, .len = 0x320,
+               .features = MIXER_SDM845_MASK,
+               .sblk = &sdm845_lm_sblk,
+               .lm_pair = LM_0,
+               .pingpong = PINGPONG_1,
+               .dspp = DSPP_1,
+       }, {
+               .name = "lm_2", .id = LM_2,
+               .base = 0x46000, .len = 0x320,
+               .features = MIXER_SDM845_MASK,
+               .sblk = &sdm845_lm_sblk,
+               .lm_pair = LM_5,
+               .pingpong = PINGPONG_2,
+       }, {
+               .name = "lm_5", .id = LM_5,
+               .base = 0x49000, .len = 0x320,
+               .features = MIXER_SDM845_MASK,
+               .sblk = &sdm845_lm_sblk,
+               .lm_pair = LM_2,
+               .pingpong = PINGPONG_3,
+       },
+};
+
+static const struct dpu_dspp_cfg sdm670_dspp[] = {
+       {
+               .name = "dspp_0", .id = DSPP_0,
+               .base = 0x54000, .len = 0x1800,
+               .features = DSPP_SC7180_MASK,
+               .sblk = &sdm845_dspp_sblk,
+       }, {
+               .name = "dspp_1", .id = DSPP_1,
+               .base = 0x56000, .len = 0x1800,
+               .features = DSPP_SC7180_MASK,
+               .sblk = &sdm845_dspp_sblk,
+       },
+};
+
 static const struct dpu_dsc_cfg sdm670_dsc[] = {
        {
                .name = "dsc_0", .id = DSC_0,
@@ -88,8 +136,10 @@ const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sdm670_cfg = {
        .ctl = sdm845_ctl,
        .sspp_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm670_sspp),
        .sspp = sdm670_sspp,
-       .mixer_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_lm),
-       .mixer = sdm845_lm,
+       .mixer_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm670_lm),
+       .mixer = sdm670_lm,
+       .dspp_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm670_dspp),
+       .dspp = sdm670_dspp,
        .pingpong_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_pp),
        .pingpong = sdm845_pp,
        .dsc_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm670_dsc),

-- 
2.39.5

Reply via email to