Since GC and IGC masks have now been dropped DSPP_MSM8998_MASK
is same as DSPP_SC7180_MASK. Since DSPP_SC7180_MASK is used more
than DSPP_MSM8998_MASK, lets drop the latter.

Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhin...@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suij...@somainline.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h | 4 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c          | 2 --
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h
index bdcd554fc8a8..a4679f72a262 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h
@@ -127,9 +127,9 @@ static const struct dpu_pingpong_cfg msm8998_pp[] = {
 };
 
 static const struct dpu_dspp_cfg msm8998_dspp[] = {
-       DSPP_BLK("dspp_0", DSPP_0, 0x54000, DSPP_MSM8998_MASK,
+       DSPP_BLK("dspp_0", DSPP_0, 0x54000, DSPP_SC7180_MASK,
                 &msm8998_dspp_sblk),
-       DSPP_BLK("dspp_1", DSPP_1, 0x56000, DSPP_MSM8998_MASK,
+       DSPP_BLK("dspp_1", DSPP_1, 0x56000, DSPP_SC7180_MASK,
                 &msm8998_dspp_sblk),
 };
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
index 791a6fc8bdbf..efd466f6122b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
@@ -91,8 +91,6 @@
 
 #define MERGE_3D_SM8150_MASK (0)
 
-#define DSPP_MSM8998_MASK BIT(DPU_DSPP_PCC)
-
 #define DSPP_SC7180_MASK BIT(DPU_DSPP_PCC)
 
 #define INTF_SDM845_MASK (0)
-- 
2.40.1

Reply via email to