On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 08:54:20PM -0500, Richard Acayan wrote:
> The Snapdragon 670 uses similar clocks (with one frequency added) to the
> Snapdragon 845 but reports DPU revision 4.1.0. Add support for this DPU
> with configuration from the Pixel 3a downstream kernel.
>
> Link: 
> https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/368478b0ae76566927a2769a2bf24dfe7f38bb78/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm670-sde.dtsi
> Signed-off-by: Richard Acayan <[email protected]>
> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c    | 67 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> index 0f3da480b066..6a077a9ef7a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> @@ -504,6 +504,25 @@ static const struct dpu_mdp_cfg msm8998_mdp[] = {
>       },
>  };
>  
> +static const struct dpu_mdp_cfg sdm670_mdp[] = {
> +     {
> +     .name = "top_0", .id = MDP_TOP,
> +     .base = 0x0, .len = 0x45C,
> +     .features = BIT(DPU_MDP_AUDIO_SELECT),
> +     .highest_bank_bit = 0x1,
> +     .clk_ctrls[DPU_CLK_CTRL_VIG0] = {
> +                     .reg_off = 0x2AC, .bit_off = 0},
> +     .clk_ctrls[DPU_CLK_CTRL_VIG1] = {
> +                     .reg_off = 0x2B4, .bit_off = 0},
> +     .clk_ctrls[DPU_CLK_CTRL_DMA0] = {
> +                     .reg_off = 0x2AC, .bit_off = 8},
> +     .clk_ctrls[DPU_CLK_CTRL_CURSOR0] = {
> +                     .reg_off = 0x2B4, .bit_off = 8},
> +     .clk_ctrls[DPU_CLK_CTRL_CURSOR1] = {
> +                     .reg_off = 0x2BC, .bit_off = 8},
> +     },
> +};
> +
>  static const struct dpu_mdp_cfg sdm845_mdp[] = {
>       {
>       .name = "top_0", .id = MDP_TOP,
> @@ -1154,6 +1173,11 @@ static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks 
> sdm845_dma_sblk_1 = _DMA_SBLK("9", 2);
>  static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_dma_sblk_2 = _DMA_SBLK("10", 3);
>  static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_dma_sblk_3 = _DMA_SBLK("11", 4);
>  
> +static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm670_vig_sblk_0 =
> +                             _VIG_SBLK("0", 4, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
> +static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm670_vig_sblk_1 =
> +                             _VIG_SBLK("1", 5, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
> +
>  #define SSPP_BLK(_name, _id, _base, _features, \
>               _sblk, _xinid, _type, _clkctrl) \
>       { \
> @@ -1185,6 +1209,19 @@ static const struct dpu_sspp_cfg msm8998_sspp[] = {
>               sdm845_dma_sblk_3, 13, SSPP_TYPE_DMA, DPU_CLK_CTRL_CURSOR1),
>  };
>  
> +static const struct dpu_sspp_cfg sdm670_sspp[] = {
> +     SSPP_BLK("sspp_0", SSPP_VIG0, 0x4000, VIG_SDM845_MASK,
> +             sdm670_vig_sblk_0, 0,  SSPP_TYPE_VIG, DPU_CLK_CTRL_VIG0),
> +     SSPP_BLK("sspp_1", SSPP_VIG1, 0x6000, VIG_SDM845_MASK,
> +             sdm670_vig_sblk_1, 4,  SSPP_TYPE_VIG, DPU_CLK_CTRL_VIG1),
> +     SSPP_BLK("sspp_8", SSPP_DMA0, 0x24000,  DMA_SDM845_MASK,
> +             sdm845_dma_sblk_0, 1, SSPP_TYPE_DMA, DPU_CLK_CTRL_DMA0),
> +     SSPP_BLK("sspp_9", SSPP_DMA1, 0x26000,  DMA_CURSOR_SDM845_MASK,
> +             sdm845_dma_sblk_1, 5, SSPP_TYPE_DMA, DPU_CLK_CTRL_CURSOR0),
> +     SSPP_BLK("sspp_10", SSPP_DMA2, 0x28000,  DMA_CURSOR_SDM845_MASK,
> +             sdm845_dma_sblk_2, 9, SSPP_TYPE_DMA, DPU_CLK_CTRL_CURSOR1),
> +};
> +
>  static const struct dpu_sspp_cfg sdm845_sspp[] = {
>       SSPP_BLK("sspp_0", SSPP_VIG0, 0x4000, VIG_SDM845_MASK,
>               sdm845_vig_sblk_0, 0,  SSPP_TYPE_VIG, DPU_CLK_CTRL_VIG0),
> @@ -1832,6 +1869,11 @@ static struct dpu_dsc_cfg sm8150_dsc[] = {
>       DSC_BLK("dsc_3", DSC_3, 0x80c00, BIT(DPU_DSC_OUTPUT_CTRL)),
>  };
>  
> +static struct dpu_dsc_cfg sdm670_dsc[] = {
> +     DSC_BLK("dsc_0", DSC_0, 0x80000),
> +     DSC_BLK("dsc_1", DSC_1, 0x80400),
I remember changing this, but it seems the compiler error is still here. Sorry
for that.

> +};
> +
>  /*************************************************************
>   * INTF sub blocks config
>   *************************************************************/
> @@ -2533,6 +2575,30 @@ static const struct dpu_mdss_cfg msm8998_dpu_cfg = {
>       .mdss_irqs = IRQ_SM8250_MASK,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct dpu_mdss_cfg sdm670_dpu_cfg = {
> +     .caps = &sdm845_dpu_caps,
> +     .mdp_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm670_mdp),
> +     .mdp = sdm670_mdp,
> +     .ctl_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_ctl),
> +     .ctl = sdm845_ctl,
> +     .sspp_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm670_sspp),
> +     .sspp = sdm670_sspp,
> +     .mixer_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_lm),
> +     .mixer = sdm845_lm,
> +     .pingpong_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_pp),
> +     .pingpong = sdm845_pp,
> +     .dsc_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm670_dsc),
> +     .dsc = sdm670_dsc,
> +     .intf_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_intf),
> +     .intf = sdm845_intf,
> +     .vbif_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_vbif),
> +     .vbif = sdm845_vbif,
> +     .reg_dma_count = 1,
> +     .dma_cfg = &sdm845_regdma,
> +     .perf = &sdm845_perf_data,
> +     .mdss_irqs = IRQ_SDM845_MASK,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct dpu_mdss_cfg sdm845_dpu_cfg = {
>       .caps = &sdm845_dpu_caps,
>       .mdp_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_mdp),
> @@ -2840,6 +2906,7 @@ static const struct dpu_mdss_hw_cfg_handler 
> cfg_handler[] = {
>       { .hw_rev = DPU_HW_VER_301, .dpu_cfg = &msm8998_dpu_cfg},
>       { .hw_rev = DPU_HW_VER_400, .dpu_cfg = &sdm845_dpu_cfg},
>       { .hw_rev = DPU_HW_VER_401, .dpu_cfg = &sdm845_dpu_cfg},
> +     { .hw_rev = DPU_HW_VER_410, .dpu_cfg = &sdm670_dpu_cfg},
>       { .hw_rev = DPU_HW_VER_500, .dpu_cfg = &sm8150_dpu_cfg},
>       { .hw_rev = DPU_HW_VER_501, .dpu_cfg = &sm8150_dpu_cfg},
>       { .hw_rev = DPU_HW_VER_510, .dpu_cfg = &sc8180x_dpu_cfg},
> -- 
> 2.39.0
>

Reply via email to