Hi Laurent,
On 27-06-2021 23:48, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Rajeev,
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 10:21:06PM +0530, Rajeev Nandan wrote:
Do not give a warning for the eDP panels if the "bus_format" is
not specified, since most eDP panels can support more than one
bus formats and this can be auto-detected.
Also, update the check to include bpc=10 for the eDP panel.
Signed-off-by: Rajeev Nandan <rajee...@codeaurora.org>
---
Changes in v8:
- New patch, to address the review comments of Sam Ravnborg [1]
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20210621184157.gb918...@ravnborg.org/
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
index 86e5a45..f966b562 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
@@ -772,10 +772,8 @@ static int panel_simple_probe(struct device *dev,
const struct panel_desc *desc,
desc->bpc != 8);
break;
case DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP:
- if (desc->bus_format == 0)
- dev_warn(dev, "Specify missing bus_format\n");
- if (desc->bpc != 6 && desc->bpc != 8)
- dev_warn(dev, "Expected bpc in {6,8} but got: %u\n",
desc->bpc);
+ if (desc->bpc != 6 && desc->bpc != 8 && desc->bpc != 10)
+ dev_warn(dev, "Expected bpc in {6,8,10} but got: %u\n",
desc->bpc);
You'll still get a warning is bpc == 0, is that intentional ?
This was not intentional, I missed considering bpc=0 case. As we are
removing the warning for bus_format=0 then a similar thing can be done
for the bpc=0 also. The bpc value should be a valid one if it is
specified. Unlike the bus_format, bpc has few possible values that can
be checked here along with 0. Please correct me if I misunderstood the
concept.
I will fix this.
Thanks,
Rajeev
_______________________________________________
Freedreno mailing list
Freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/freedreno
