So your DECTalk driver refuses to be installed once the VIDE-CDD driver has 
been installed, did I understand you correctly?
What about changing the order in which your CONFIG.SYS loads the drivers?
Load first the DECTalk driver (no conflicts) and after that, VIDE-CDD. If they 
can't coexist at all that's trickier.
You could also do what Rugxulo suggested:
>Can't you just edit a CONFIG.SYS menu option to let you optionally>boot 
>without DecTalk when needing to access a physical CD-ROM?
About the FreeDOS drivers, as far as I know, FreeDOS uses GCDROM and UDVD2 as 
CD/DVD drivers.
GCDROM was designed for SATA but works with IDE too apparently.
You can try them both and see how to it goes, here are some links:
GCDROMhttp://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/repositories/1.3/drivers/gcdrom.zip
UDVD2:https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/repositories/1.3/drivers/udvd2.zip
    On Friday, February 2, 2024 at 02:01:21 AM GMT-3, Karen Lewellen via 
Freedos-user <freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:  
 
 Humor is an individual thing.
The package I use incorporates ms DOS 7.1 with a number of utilities 
updated  from 6.22.
I have scores of reasons for preferring the package, using a full sized USB 
keyboard as I am doing now to write this email  is just one of them.
Greater memory and hard drive capacity, at least in my personal 
experience, 7.1 is the DOS infrastructure under Windows 98 se, even broader 
processor speed.
but that is me. I am a firm believer in the Personal in personal computer, 
would not expect another person to make choices based on my own..we are 
different people after all.
Kare



On Thu, 1 Feb 2024, andrew fabbro wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 4:29 PM Karen Lewellen via Freedos-user <
> freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>> Forcibly demand?
>> What an interesting choice of term..why not did the job for which i
>> contracted them?
>>
>
> He was making a joke as a way of asking why you would want to run MS-DOS
> 7.1.
>
> IIRC it was never intended to be a standalone product.  I'm curious what
> the personal reasons are, or what 7.1 gives you that 6.22 (or FreeDOS)
> can't.
>
> -- 
> andrew fabbro
> and...@fabbro.org
>_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
  
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

Reply via email to