Hi!

On Mar 27 2020 05:14, Rugxulo wrote:
> I only have DR-DOS 7.03, but AFAIK, DR-DOS 5 was compatible to MS-DOS
> 3.3, DR 6 was their 5, and 7 was (of course) 6 compatible (though it
> pretended to be PC-DOS, technically, unless you specifically asked
> elsewhere).
>
> So, yes, FreeDOS should be more compatible than DR-DOS 5 [sic].
>
> Although you could probably still download (non-commercial only)
> EDR-DOS (circa 2005) from the Wayback Machine. Not sure where
> "official" DR-DOS disappeared to either. I guess they don't sell it
> online (anymore??). 7.03 is from 1999 (and the one with TaskMgr,
> limited to 64 MB per task, using its own proprietary EMM386 only with
> mandatory built-in DPMI).
>
> Yes, DJGPP is still updated (e.g. GCC 9.2, BinUtils 2.34, Make 4.3)
> and thus newer than GCCs for "old Linuxes". Though you could probably
> get some Linux guru to recompile newer for your old distro, if you
> asked nicely. Not a lot of libraries for DOS anymore, but some stuff
> still works.


Yes, FreeDOS tends to be growing, which makes sense. For old computers,
original to that time, EDR-DOS might be a better choice. Digital
Research did a hell of a job making CP/M into a real good version of
DOS, with compatibility to MS-DOS i.e. PC DOS. I think DR DOS 6.0 did
that job, although DR DOS 5 (which I still own and used back than, I
even have the original box somewhere!) was my favourite. But I guess
that's just nostalgia. DR DOS 7.03 as well as EDR-DOS seems to be a very
good choice. Take some selected tools from FreeDOS (EMM386 replacement,
ATAPI drivers and such, as well as some solid applications and utils
from FreeDOS) and you will have a great DOS for an original machine.


Anyway, 8 MB RAM seems to be one of the problems, with Linux a big one,
with FreeDOS a small one. The other is disk space. As I mentioned, I
cannot get the standard FreeDOS 1.1 installation installed for that reason.


I assume that FreeDOS will also run very well on such a machine, but all
developement went into making it fit for newer machines, integrating
FAT32 and such, all of which are features not required for this original
machine.


A.


_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

Reply via email to