SMB1 has known vulnerabilities, so Windows has had the option to disable SMB 1 entirely for a while and on the Linux side, upstream SAMBA recently changed to disabling it by default. It is possible that various distros may already have disabled it in their default SAMBA configurations.
-------- Original message -------- From: David Griffith <[email protected]> Date: 10/13/2019 08:23 (GMT-06:00) To: [email protected] Subject: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS and Samba What am I doing wrong with FreeDOS and mounting a Samba file share? I have a Virtualbox image I found at https://www.lazybrowndog.net/freedos/virtualbox/?page_id=33 which seems to have everything ready for networking. I have Samba installed on the host Linux machine. From the host I can mount the share, but not entirely on FreeDOS. The best I can manage is read-only access if the "valid users" parameter (below) is removed. I managed to get this to work a few years ago and recall that the solution has something to do with using SMB protocol 1. None of the guides I find now for mounting a share from FreeDOS mention this and Samba now seems unwilling to admit it knows anything about SMB1. Here's what I have for the share in /etc/smb.conf: [Dave] comment = Dave's stuff path = /home/dave/foobar read only = no guest ok = yes browsable = yes writable = yes valid users = dave -- David Griffith [email protected] A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
_______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
