On 7/6/2012 12:25 PM, C. Masloch wrote: > I agree, I'm certainly overly pedantic and unreasonable and silly. > > And you're the one using the term "intellectual property" as if that was a > coherent concept. > > =) >
I guess I don't understand that last message either. The purpose of all of these licenses is to protect the thought that goes into the code, and that is commonly recognized as intellectual property. You are willing to argue the finer points of each license and how it restricts the usage of the code (read: intellectual property), but do you mean to imply here that intellectual property is not a coherent concept? If so, why be pedantic over something that is not coherent? On that note, I'm going back to playing with my intellectual property. Sorry .. I meant code ... Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
