Ralf A. Quint schrieb: >> Not the programmer of DOSLFN would be sued, also probable not the >> hypothetical programmer for LFN in DOS-C. >> >> I think it's the distributor who would get sued and this is in this case >> the responsible person for the website. (Fortunally also other people >> are redistribution FreeDOS and/or DOSLFN but to sue freedos.org does not >> mean that them get also automatically sued.) >> >> So programming LFN for DOS-C wouldn't make a difference. The risk to get >> sued is already there and not bigger because the patent is already >> violated so or so. > > Again, I think you are to "blauäugig" here. Two > times wrong doesn't make things right....
I don't understand this sentence. What's 2 times wrong? > And I don't think that Jim is happy with your POV > of him being the one being sued and not you... My point of view doesn't matter if I am wrong and even my reality doesn't change the "absolute" reality. That I may be wrong I regard as possible, otherwise the whole discussion makes no point. To be honest, I would be happy if it turns into "Jim is not responsible". Unfortunately I do not see an indicator for that but I am glad to get prof wrong. -mr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
