Hi!
4-Авг-2006 11:40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
MD> However, it appears that the entire intent of this scouring of source code
MD> and run of changes was to eventually force a conflict by taking offense
MD> where none was intended or to refuse a simple request because "it wasn't
MD> necessary". Then branch off a new EMM386 the same as HIMEM, and stir up
MD> more trouble or to make some dumb point, as has already happened with
MD> HIMEM.
But why you not make diff between yours and his sources and try to
extract, at least, most valuable changes? Especially diff is enough small.
I think, rejecting complete changes just because you not liked some person
or you not liked some change properties (like missing descriptions) isn't
wise.
MD> That's a pretty sad commentary on things. Behavior like this is
MD> another reason I'm not terribly interested in continuing as maintainer.
Michael, life wasn't and isn't perfect, :( don't accept this too near.
:)
MD> But I and the rest of the FreeDOS users do appreciate the actual bugs found
MD> along the way. Good job on that.
:)
PS: 2Eric: if you wish, I may upload somewhere archive with patch for
EMM386, which makes EMM386 TC/BC-compatible (though, I post it already
here), and archive with batch and makefiles of build subsystem. Then you may
yourself decise, is it worth accepting or not.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
