Michael Devore wrote:
WD is plain old goofy. It has had a "slightly unstable" reputation under DOS for over ten years. You could be seeing nothing more than the OS memory image having different byte values at a particular location(s), or slightly varied free memory values, or an internal operation delta which isn't part of the DOS documented interface.

Or WD could be unhappy with the memory drivers. Check with and without HIMEM and EMM386 or try Microsoft versions of same under FreeDOS, see if it makes any difference.


I think maybe you misunderstood what I said. I can't test "with and without HIMEM and EMM386" because the problems with WD only occur when using FreeCOM (not FreeDOS, i.e. the kernel) on Win98. There are no problems when using any of the following combinations:
- Microsoft COMMAND.COM on Win98
- Microsoft COMMAND.COM on MS-DOS (the version shipped with Win98)
- FreeCOM on FreeDOS


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

Reply via email to