> I had observed a problem with the Subst in the FreeDOS, but as not had > observed in the MSDOS, did not comment. > If to use subst physically using an existing letter of drive (or > partition), is not possible to work correctly. > It would be a Bug, really? > > Roma >
I did a little bit more testings about the CHDIR-Problem in the meantime: o It even does not work with not physically existing drive letters (e. g. M:). o The Bug is NOT in SUBST.EXE. I booted MS-DOS and replaced there the SUBST.EXE with the one from FreeDOS and did my subst example. The warning 'SUBST: Warning physical path D:\ cannot be made' stays, but everything works! o The Bug is even NOT in COMMAND.COM. I booted MS-DOS with the COMMAND.COM from FreeDOS and did my subst example. There were a few warnings, but the subst command works. Tim -- Sparen beginnt mit GMX DSL: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
