On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:24:57 -0230, you wrote:

Hi,

>> DOS-HIGH,UMB
>> Don't waste the UMB!
>UMBs should only be used if you're desperate for memory. I don't trust them.

For some stupid game or demo I've to reserve enough room in base
memory ...

>> FILES=50
>> BUFFERS=10,0
>FILES=50? What a waste of RAM (unless you have an app that uses 50 file
>handles)

Because I'm lazy, usually 20 is enough but to avoid some application
will did this, I think it really a bit large ...

>As for buffers, FD will ignore that and fill leftover HMA with buffers. I
>put mine there for completeness.

FreeDOS did a good job in memory allocation, the Kernel guys is
incredible

>> IMO, lastdrive can be "Z"
>Yes it can, but that's a waste of RAM if you don't need it.

But I still got more than 590K in base memory :-)

>You're right on that one. I just put it there for safety and historic
>compatibility.

Play safe :-)

>Only if you have a TSR that provides access to the UMA (like EMM386.EXE or
>something)

Arkady told me CTMOUSE will automatically LoadHi itself, what a great
design!

>> If the only OS is FreeDOS, otherwise Win9x will modify CONFIG.SYS and
>AUTOEXEC.BAT
>Ah so some people use FD and Win9x side by side. Sure enough.
>Thanks for your input,

Thanks, I got a lesson :-)


Rgds,
Johnson.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
>From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the
one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

Reply via email to