+1 Petter I'm still committed to building on FreedomBox as a platform (also because there is no other choice) and the project feels overextended at the moment. The only "features" I need is security and reliability for a user-installed, connected server with Let's Encrypt and dynamic DNS that can be accessed and managed from any mobile browser.
I realize that most of the work is already on these core, platform-ish aspects of the project, so please do not take my comment as harsh. Adrian On Tuesday, June 21, 2016, Petter Reinholdtsen <[email protected]> wrote: > [Bob Mottram] > > Indeed having folks on unstable is a bad idea. Things may improve once > > the next version of Debian is out (end of 2016?) and there can then be a > > stable version of FreedomBox. > > Sure. But I suspect we should cater for those wanting a bit more > stability by prividing a version based on testing for users, in addition > to the one based on unstable for us developers. :) > > Because I am not convinced FreedomBox development will be settles down > enough at the end of the year for us to accept the responsibility to > keep a stable version working with only security and RC updates for 3-5 > years. > > -- > Happy hacking > Petter Reinholdtsen > > _______________________________________________ > Freedombox-discuss mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:;> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss > -- Adrian Gropper MD PROTECT YOUR FUTURE - RESTORE Health Privacy! HELP us fight for the right to control personal health data. DONATE: http://patientprivacyrights.org/donate-2/
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
