Den 26 nov 2013 09:19 skrev "Tim Retout" <[email protected]>: > > On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 23:57 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > [Tim Retout] > > > Future extensions: > > > ================== > > [...] > > > - How would services on public IPs be offered? (UPnP to punch > > > through the router, and then Freedombuddy tells others about them?) > > > > I suspect something like pagekite is the way forward here, at least as > > an option if uPnP or similar isn't an option. At least with my ISP, > > port 80 is blocked on inbound traffic. :( > > I agree Pagekite is nice because it sidesteps dynamic home IPs by > proxying back from a public server, and it gives you a name in the > "real" DNS system. You can use CNAMEs to point your own domain name at > the pagekite.me names, or potentially run your own Pagekite server > instance.
If using a tunnel is OK, why not use IPv6 directly, maybe with SecureIP? > This implies that hiding a given Freedombox's IP from Pagekite/the NSA > is not a requirement. :) > > Part of me worries that this is a sort-of-centralized solution. I think > this is okay from a security point of view - we just treat the server as > an untrusted part of the network link. Have you tried running your own > pagekite server? > > The other limitation is that only HTTP, HTTPS and SSH are handled by > Pagekite. I would quite like to support mail protocols and XMPP too. Well, IPv6 is supported by IPv6. > -- > Tim Retout <[email protected]> /Anders
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
