On 09/12/2013 04:40 PM, Simo wrote: > On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 15:13 +0100, [email protected] wrote: >> Gnutls may be usable as an alternative to Openssl. >> It's already in Debian, new to me. > > What's wrong with OpenSSL that GNUTLS get's right ?
* Licensing that is not deliberately incompatible with the GPL.
* A sane and modern library API (granted, parts of OpenSSL are have
these features too; most projects are mired in the horror, though)
* delegation of specific tasks to other libraries, rather than
kitchen-sink agglomeration.
There are probably other reasons.
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
