On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 11:06 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi Rob, > > Quoting Rob van der Hoeven (2013-05-10 10:03:40) > > > > Unfortunately, LXC still seems to have broken templates. > > > > > > [details of breakage snipped] > > > > > > You make it clear that in your opinion LXC is ideal for FreedomBox, > > > but you also make it clear that it is not currently working. Please > > > then _invite_ others on this list over to that relevant bugreport to > > > work further on solving those details. > > > > > > So please, folks interested in getting LXC into shape, please read > > > http://bugs.debian.org/680469 and consider post updates to > > > [email protected] . > > > > > > > Why do you think this will work?
> Please don't inject interpretation into questions like that - it is not > nice: I did not promise solution, only recommended against inflation. > The question is related to the history of the bug. I wrongly assumed that you had read the history and was wondering why you thought that posting updates to the bug report would help. > Bugs related to a single package is best discussed in a bugreport > against that package. Because it is most efficient for people > interested and/or knowledgeable in some package to gather together. I fully agree.. > This mailinglist is for discussing FreedomBox. Makes good sense to > discuss here when a package needs a customization specific for > FreedomBox, but not to discuss details of each and every package used in > FreedomBox. If someone thinks his/her FreedomBox implementation needs a package and that package does not work, we should know about it, and if we can help - we should offer help. We should especially welcome questions of anyone who is actually building (or has) a home server, there are too few of them on the list. > Oh, seems it is not really the bug you want to discuss, but the related > social issue of "package maintainer treats the bug wrongfully!". > > General logic is that each person or team each maintaining a package > knows best how to handle that package, which implies having final say in > bugreports. If dissatisfied with treatment of a bugreport, next step is > the technical committee: http://www.debian.org/devel/tech-ctte The technical committee seems the way to go. > Hope that helps, It does, thanks. Rob. http://freedomboxblog.nl _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
