----- Original Message ----- > From: Ted Smith <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, January 6, 2013 2:29 PM > Subject: Re: [Freedombox-discuss] FreedomBuddy to use Tor to resolve IP > address of nodes? > > On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 16:20 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> I believe Tor is only relevant to consider including into FreedomBox >> when someone can provide sensible defaults for it which can be >> integrated with the Debian packaging of Tor. >> >> Until then, Tor is outside the scope of FreedomBox, in my opinion. > > The current default for Tor's debian package is to operate Tor in client > mode with a SOCKSv5 listener on port 9050. > > Is not a sensible default?
For sensible defaults to be provided in the Debian Tor package Jonas needs to either a) explain what he's talking about or b) provide a link that gives the specifics of what "sensible" means in this context. -Jonathan > It captures almost all of the use cases I've > seen discussed. > > For dynamically creating hidden services, you'd probably want to use a > Tor controller anyway, not writing to configuration and reloading it all > the time, if that's what you're thinking is not sensible enough. > > -- > Sent from Ubuntu > > > _______________________________________________ > Freedombox-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss > _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
