On 07/12/12 14:08, Markus Sabadello wrote: > BTW, is either one of the two the "official" or "preferred" one? I > think at one point you referred to them as the box-hopping-gnu and the > butterfly-gnu :) Then there's also the one > at http://freedomboxfoundation.org/
There is one official logo: the butterfly. http://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/VisualIdentity?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=FreedomBox-Logo.7z Please do use that one all the time. Having just one logo isn't just copying big corporations bad karma - it is critical to the success of any project that relies on public recognition. > Also, any update on the licensing question that came up a while ago, > or is that still kind of unclear? I like the idea of dual licencing: GPL3+ to be able to release it with code and CC-BY-SA to let everybody print & use it. I'll clarify that in a seperate mail to the list to give the project lead opportunity to react. > > For example, would anything be wrong with using a modified version of > one of the logos for a local FreedomBox community, e.g. see > here? https://metalab.at/wiki/FreedomBox > > Markus Not at all, there is a guideline that you could have a look at first: http://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/VisualIdentity?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=FreedomBox-Identity-Manual.pdf Mentioning this makes me really sad since we even have a logo for the foundation and an finished website design that just won't go online. :( Robert _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
