On 2012-06-24 22:49, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > That said, i'd like to point out that your concerns about provider > control of your persistent address are *exactly* why we need a common > naming scheme that doesn't encourage this kind of hierarchy.
For security you don't need to have this. Encryption and authentication is performed end-to-end. As far as I understand it, you can use PageKite with your own X.509 certificates and with Certificate Patrol this should be pretty good security. PageKite can only stop to forward data, as any other internet access provider can. So it don't see a real problem here. Regards, Matthias-Christian _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
