> Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 11:47:38 +0200 > From: Robert Martinez <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Freedombox-discuss] The video > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > > On 02/04/12 11:35, Rob van der Hoeven wrote: > > Another idea. Why don't we host our videos on our own server? > > All our video's are hosted on commercial websites like youtube, > > vimeo etc. Shouldn't we protect our visitors from these snooping > > companies? > > > > Rob. > > http://freedomboxblog.nl > > > > > > I guess this would be an extra effort and result a bunch of new > challanges. (cloud services perform more reliable and stable probably) > *.webm via HTML5 <video> on our own server would be practising what > we preach :D > > But lets first care about having a proper video at all! > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Freedombox-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss > > End of Freedombox-discuss Digest, Vol 21, Issue 2 > *************************************************
I am not much in videos, but have recommended: http://videobin.org/ to people not happy with vimeo or youtoube, and they have been happy with that instead. As far i know mediagoblin added support for video short ago (it's a very "young" project, sure).
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
