On 12-03-25 at 01:08pm, [email protected] wrote: > A brainstorming question - > > If we're looking for some sort of addressing scheme where > non-freedomboxen could contact a freedombox to actually view content > (say, a whistleblower's document served up by Apache), wouldn't a > SIP URI do? I still have to set up and play with SIP Witch before I > understand it: > https://www.gnu.org/software/sipwitch/ > > ...but it seems to me that this part is pretty relevant to us: > "One important feature will include use of URI routing to support > direct peer to peer calls between service domains over the public > internet without needing mediation of an intermediary "service > provider" so that people can publish and call sip: uri's > unconstrained."
Beware that above phrase is future tense: SIP Witch gained some publicity from it but so far haven't implemented peer-to-peer SIP. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
