URL:
<http://gna.org/patch/?7958>
Summary: autoattack: restore player ability to specify who
can autoattack
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: sveinung
Submitted on: Mon 07 Nov 2016 01:27:03 PM UTC
Category: general
Priority: 5 - Normal
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Planned Release:
Contains string changes: None
_______________________________________________________
Details:
In patch #7942 Jacob Nevins <jtn> said:
> (BTW, since you're working on autoattack, I don't suppose you fancy
restoring the ability for the player to specify which units can autoattack?
Last time I looked into it, there didn't seem to be any good reason for this
to have been removed. I might actually use autoattack if I could control it
better. Obviously that's a discussion for another ticket.)
I have been thinking about it. The current behavior is useful as an
alternative to enabling ZoC. A more detailed/realistic ruleset may wish to
give the player control over what units may autoattack. I therefore suggest
giving autoattack three states: disabled, player controlled and enabled.
Adding a state could also be an opportunity to rename it to something like
"initiative". This would reflect that it isn't mere unit automation[1].
[1] The autoattack setting can, unlike a client side order, make a unit attack
an enemy unit in the middle of the enemy unit's order execution. This can be
seen as a representation of a unit acting on its own initiative (3rd and 4th
generation war) rather than waiting for orders from the top (1st and 2nd
generation war).
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/patch/?7958>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
