On 25 March 2015 at 09:28, Marko Lindqvist <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please let me know soon if some items should be added to 2.6 status.
One thing I would hear opinions about is related to patch #5340 currently targeted to 2.6.0 - or more generally bug #22234 "Scenarios could be compatible with more than one ruleset". Is that something that we still should add to 2.6 goals (as patch #5340 suggests)? I've done some related work on TRUNK since S2_6 was branched, with the idea that we could have this in 3.0. I think it's going to be quite a lot of work, so I wouldn't add it to S2_6 at this point, despite it being relatively often requested feature. It would be also easier to add in 3.0 together with savegame3.c - savegame2.c would be known to always be of old format (created in 2.6 or earlier), and savegame3.c of the new format (created in 3.0 or later) what comes to support of using alternative rulesets with a scenario savegame. - ML _______________________________________________ Freeciv-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
