On 10/3/14, Marko Lindqvist <[email protected]> wrote: > On 20 August 2014 15:28, Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Generalized action enablers >> Current status: All spy actions are controlled by generalized action >> enablers. Most requirements to enable the spy actions live in the >> ruleset. Some rough edges remain. > > The question I have about action enablers is that should we limit > their scope in 2.6 to "diplomat & caravan actions", or are we going to > throw in other kind of actions too? Diplomat+Caravan would at least be > clear cutting point so we don't end to adding "just one more action > type" when S2_6 should be stabilizing.
Good question. Another alternative is to limit 2.6 to unit vs city (not cities) and unit vs unit (not units). > The question arises as I have > some action enablers in my TODO (to either do myself, or to at least > raise a ticket) and I'm not sure if I should postpone to after S2_6 > branching. I'm glad to hear this. >> Generalized actions >> Not started. Will probably wait until after 2.6. May in stead add some >> new hard coded actions that ruleset authors can play with. > > This is not an dependency (even soft one) for any other features > going to 2.6? Correct. If an action needs configuration it can be done as regular options. > This sounds like something that takes us forever to get > AI to handle -> better to leave to beginning of 3.0 cycle than to make > 2.6 wait it to get ready and stable. Agreed. -- Sincerely, Sveinung _______________________________________________ Freeciv-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
