Follow-up Comment #1, patch #3879 (project freeciv): >or by changing the word used to be something positive. I agree. >Note that the introduction of nreqs uses an entirely different mechanism than that suggested in patch #3332 The mechanism was wrong and my original idea was confuse. My purpose was the patch #1342, where requirement_vector nreqs replaced obsoleted_by. This was the second step.
The first step was in patch #1339, where requirement_vector reqs replaced the fields require_advance, need_improvement and need_government. Same for patch #1341 and #1340. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://gna.org/patch/?3879> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ _______________________________________________ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev