Follow-up Comment #15, patch #3826 (project freeciv):
My apologies. I suppose I'm used to significantly less mature projects, where
a feature freeze tends to happen only immediately prior to release (but
releases correspondingly tend to be buggier without the overlap).
Attached is a patch with the trivalue logic. I noticed while producing this
that we unconditionally remove obsolete buildings on city takeover: while I
think it outside the scope of this patch (improvements don't currently use
negated requirements to indicate obsolescence, nor do roads/bases have a cache
of potential obsolecense conditions), it probably makes sense to review this
code section for 2.6, and give the same treatment for improvements and extras:
the new player may not want some obsolete infrastructure which no longer
provides a useful bonus (or may even cause a penalty, depending on applicable
effects).
(file #17815)
_______________________________________________________
Additional Item Attachment:
File name: allow-bases-in-cities+less-stunning.patch Size:37 KB
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/patch/?3826>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
