Follow-up Comment #5, bug #16065 (project freeciv):
> Checked; if this is just a documentation of current code
> state, I disagree with your flag listings. If it was a
> proposal, disregard this...
Thanks for the check! I did the patch the first time around and there were
errors (see gna patch #1600); so this time I asked for help ;-)
The analysis is after the attached patch is applied. So the two differences
are due to changes in the code. Furthermore I corrected the logic in
ai_military_attack_barbarian().
I will wait if somebody else comments before applying the patch but latest
next weekend.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?16065>
_______________________________________________
Nachricht geschickt von/durch Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
