On 12-12-2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: > Not only is this not necessary if you run xscreensaver already, it's > probably a bad idea. At minimum, can you make this optional? > [cvs-lists omitted]
I could make it optional if you insist, but if you do a fresh install with xfce4-utils but without xlockmore you'll notice the dangling invocation. I don't see that xlockmore and xscreensaver conflict, so why would it be a Bad Idea(TM) ? Regards, René > On 12/11/2011 04:56, Rene Ladan wrote: >> rene 2011-12-11 12:56:18 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Modified files: >> sysutils/xfce4-utils Makefile >> Log: >> - Add a runtime dependency on x11/xlockmore so that xflock4 can invoke >> xlock. >> - Bump PORTREVISION >> >> Feature safe: yes >> >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.58 +3 -0 ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils/Makefile >> >> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils/Makefile.diff?&r1=1.57&r2=1.58&f=h >> > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xfce To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
