hm!
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 08:02, qcwap <1051244...@qq.com> wrote:
>
> This patch corrects ieee80211_vht_get_vhtcap_ie for 160/80P80 channel width
> recognition.
>
> diff --git a/sys/net80211/ieee80211.h b/sys/net80211/ieee80211.h
> index 86ab1459cca..76c43629b33 100644
> --- a/sys/net80211/ieee80211.h
> +++ b/sys/net80211/ieee80211.h
> @@ -811,9 +811,9 @@ struct ieee80211_ie_vht_operation {
> #define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK 0x0000000C
> #define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK_S 2
> #define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_NONE 0
> -#define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160MHZ 1
> -#define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160_80P80MHZ 2
> -#define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_RESERVED 3
> +#define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160MHZ 4
> +#define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160_80P80MHZ 8
> +#define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_RESERVED 16
>
> #define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_IS_160MHZ(_vhtcaps)
> \
> (_IEEE80211_MASKSHIFT(_vhtcaps, IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK)
> >= \
This is the flag change from the draft 11ac spec to the released 11ac
spec, right?
I remember they needed to change the flags because existing draft
implementations got the 80+80/160MHz negotiation really badly wrong in
some interop places...
-adrian
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
