https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251046
Mark Johnston <ma...@freebsd.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ma...@freebsd.org
Status|New |Open
--- Comment #3 from Mark Johnston <ma...@freebsd.org> ---
PRIV_IO access is not required only by /dev/io, it is also required for
sysarch(I386_SET_IOPERM), which is otherwise available to jailed processes. So
the patch definitely should not be committed. A better solution would be to
extend pci(4) so that bhyve can use it to do everything required for PCI
passthrough. Even then I'm not sure why it's useful to jail the bhyve process
- what does it buy you?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
