https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236989
--- Comment #23 from Colin Percival <cperc...@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Charles O'Donnell from comment #22) Thanks! We ended up going with a slightly more conservative patch than the one I provided above (defaulting to 4k buffers rather than switching, since we weren't sure if we could switch fast enough) but your statistics are useful (and confirm the decision to go with the more conservative option -- you have 1640 failed 9k allocations which will have added some network latency during busy periods). I suggest waiting until we get the Errata Notice out and then switching over to the patch we send out with that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
