On 10-3-2020 19:08, Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 9:28 AM Willem Jan Withagen <w...@digiware.nl> wrote:
problem that libblock_rbd.so is stripped in such a way that the symbol I need is removed.
So either I'm doing it the wrong way, like special options on the symbols oid. However, I think there's something wrong with your library, too. The library should be usable even if it's stripped.
Yes, strip only removes local symbols (.symtab), not exported ones (.dynsym).
I checked with objdump, and the symbol that I need is definitly not present in the stripped version.
How are you defining the symbol intended for export? Is the symbol a function or data? Does the compiler flag -fvisibility=hidden get used? Which symbol is missing and what are the symptoms?
And it does not really matter if I declare it static or not.
Not declaring it "static" is necessary, if not sufficient. Looking at your code on github, here are some issues: * In block_if.h, you define an object blocklocal_backend. This is a header, and every compilation unit that pulls in the header will get its own copy of blocklocal_backend. You probably want 'extern block_backend_t blocklocal_backend;' instead.

I have fixed this in a different way, so I do not need to play tricks with
    blocklocal_backend
to handle the legacy case.So that is removed.

* You SET_DECLARE block_backend_set in block_if.c, but I think it needs to be in block_if.h.
Looked at the Macro definition, and it is `extern` so it can go into block_if.h

* There is some weirdness around linker sets being removed by the linker if they are empty, so you may want to add blockbackend_local to the linker set in the main program. (It's unclear to me why blockbackend_local is treated specially regardless.) However, I'm not quite sure why DATA_SET() in block_rbd.c is not creating __start_set_block_backend_set / __stop_set_block_backend_set exported symbols. As Alan asked, please provide 'nm -D foo.so'. Best, Conrad

It is dynamic loaded with dlopen()/dlsym at the moment.
But are you suggesting that a `DATA_SET()` actually adds to the set during dynamic loading? Note that the __start_set_block_backend_set / __stop_set_block_backend_setis avialable in the library.

--WjW
_______________________________________________
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
"freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to