https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216760
--- Comment #4 from rai...@ultra-secure.de --- Oh, I've never tried that. (freebsd11 </root>) 0 # dc3dd wipe=/dev/md0 dc3dd 7.2.641 started at 2017-02-06 12:37:44 +0100 compiled options: command line: dc3dd wipe=/dev/md0 device size: 8388608 sectors (probed), 4,294,967,296 bytes sector size: 512 bytes (probed) 4294967296 bytes ( 4 G ) copied ( 100% ), 8 s, 507 M/s input results for pattern `00': 8388608 sectors in output results for device `/dev/md0': 8388608 sectors out dc3dd completed at 2017-02-06 12:37:52 +0100 You're right, memory performance is still sufficient on XenServer. This is real hardware: root@bsd1-build-prod:~ # dc3dd wipe=/dev/md0 dc3dd 7.2.641 started at 2017-02-06 12:40:58 +0100 compiled options: command line: dc3dd wipe=/dev/md0 device size: 8388608 sectors (probed), 4,294,967,296 bytes sector size: 512 bytes (probed) 4294967296 bytes ( 4 G ) copied ( 100% ), 6 s, 656 M/s input results for pattern `00': 8388608 sectors in output results for device `/dev/md0': 8388608 sectors out dc3dd completed at 2017-02-06 12:41:04 +0100 Though one generation later, so faster RAM, faster CPUs. I'd be happy with that kind of disk-performance loss in a DomU :-( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
