Jason Helfman wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Jason Helfman wrote: > > > > > I have a number of ports that I maintain, that I really never use but at > > > one time I did. Initially, I put them into the portstree to help out the > > > community, with the idea that I would be using them one day, however I > > work > > > at a VMware shop, and the likelihood of me using this software is looking > > > far less likely. I was wondering if it would be okay to assign these > > ports > > > to virtualization group? > > > > > > deskutils/virt-manager > > > devel/libvirt > > > devel/libvirt-glib > > > devel/libvirt-java > > > devel/py-libvirt > > > devel/spice-protocol > > > net-mgmt/virt-viewer > > > > FWIW, I could take care of libvirt, py-libvirt, libvirt-glib and > > virt-manager. > > > > Roman Bogorodskiy > > > > > Sounds good, thanks! Additionally, if you are going to take virt-manager, > you really should take spice-protocol and virt-viewer as they are > dependencies and require updates for virt-manager. > Thoughts?
Yes, it looks reasonable. Roman Bogorodskiy
pgp3l_WEY6j5a.pgp
Description: PGP signature
