On May 19, 2011, at 7:49 AM, Frank Razenberg wrote: > > What happens if you'd directly bridge it to an em(4) without the lagg etc. > > in between > Thanks, you're right, taking the lagg0 out and adding em0 to the bridge > instead works indeed. Can I assume that's a bug in if_lagg then? If so, where > should I report it, the freebsd-bugs list?
Yeah likely it's a lagg(4) problem then; check the PR database first: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?text=lagg If it's there follow-up to the bug in question, otherwise I'd suggest to report it. If you can simplify the setup without VIMAGE that might help. For example em - lagg - epairNa - epairNb (IP only here) em - bridge - epairNa - epairNb (IP only here) should both just work as well I think and be good for testing. Maybe reference this thread so people have the information: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2011-May/thread.html#707 Alternatively ask on freebsd-net@ . /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family. _______________________________________________ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
