On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Mikolaj Golub wrote:


On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:44:41 -0800 Julian Elischer wrote:

JE> On 1/23/11 6:33 AM, Mikolaj Golub wrote:

>> As a quick fix I added in VBoxNetFlt-freebsd.c in all "problem" functions
>> CURVNET_SET_QUIET(vnet0) macro, which sets td->td_vnet to default vnet (see 
the
>> attached patch). This has fixed the issue for me and now I am happily running
>> both VNET jails and VirtualBox machines on my desktop.
>>
>> But the way I fixed the issue looks hackish for me. Could someone suggest a
>> better solution?
JE> this is probably at east partially the correct solution.
JE> Usually you should also set the value back to its previous value when
JE> you leave that code as well.

Thank you for the comments. Actually the patch contained CURVNET_RESTORE()
too. I just did not mentioned it :-). So if it looks like right solution here
is an "improved" version of the patch: vnet to switch is taken from thread's
ucred (on interface initialization) or from ifp->if_vnet.

>> In case someone is interested in trying this patch, below are the 
instructions
>> how to build "VIMAGE safe" vbox driver from ports:
>>
>> cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod
>> make patch
>> cd work
>> patch -p0<  /path/to/VirtualBox-3.2.12.VIMAGE.patch
>> cd ..
>> VIMAGE=1 make

I think you should wrap the CURVNET changes in __FreeBSD_version
checks so that the port, should it run elsewhere or on older FreeBSDs
(if it runs there) not trouble people having to patch it away.

#if defined(__FreeBSD_version) && __FreeBSD_version >= 800500
#endif

might be a save bet.

/bz

--
Bjoern A. Zeeb                                 You have to have visions!
        <ks> Going to jail sucks -- <bz> All my daemons like it!
  http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html
_______________________________________________
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
"freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to