On 2019-Dec-26, at 15:21, Mark Millard <marklmi at yahoo.com> wrote: > I tried to build devel/freebsd-gcc9@powerpc on a powerpc64 (in an > ELFv1 clang environment) and it reported (listing just one of the > examples that pointed to vec_step): > > > /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/freebsd-gcc9/work-powerpc/gcc-9.2.0/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c:4595:12: > error: expected unqualified-id > tree vec_step = build_vector_from_val (cr_index_vector_type, step); > ^ > > (Unsure if white handling will still end up with ^ > pointing to vec_step.) > > clang reserves a name that the gcc source code uses: > vec_step . (I'll not get into the long, messy history > of this name and multiple standards built on top of > C/C++, not necessarily in a language appropriate > way.) > > It turns out that: > > # ls -laT /usr/ports/devel/freebsd-gcc9/files/ > total 44 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Dec 25 19:25:26 2019 . > drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Dec 25 19:25:26 2019 .. > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4781 Dec 25 19:25:26 2019 > patch-freebsd-format-extensions > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1413 Dec 25 19:25:26 2019 patch-freebsd-libdir > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 588 Dec 25 19:25:26 2019 patch-gcc-configure > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 16346 Dec 25 19:25:26 2019 patch-gcc-freebsd-mips > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 231 Dec 25 19:25:26 2019 xtoolchain.mk.in > > is missing the patch-clang-vec_step that is in: > > FBSDG5L2# ls -laT /usr/ports/lang/gcc9/files/ > total 32 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Dec 25 20:57:52 2019 . > drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Dec 25 21:07:33 2019 .. > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3450 Jun 1 18:44:50 2019 > patch-arm-unwind-cxx-support > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 651 Sep 18 11:08:37 2019 patch-clang-vec_step > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2148 Jun 1 18:44:50 2019 patch-gets-no-more > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2897 Jun 1 18:44:50 2019 patch-gfortran-libgcc > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 932 Dec 25 19:25:10 2019 patch-powerpc32 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 294 Sep 15 13:10:46 2019 pkg-message.in > > I do not know if other differences in the patch > lists might be important to other aspects (in > either direction). I should have also noted that devel/freebsd-gcc6 has the same issue: # ls -laT /usr/ports/devel/freebsd-gcc6/files/ total 44 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Dec 25 19:25:37 2019 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Dec 25 19:25:37 2019 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4657 Dec 25 19:25:37 2019 patch-freebsd-format-extensions -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1413 Dec 25 19:25:37 2019 patch-freebsd-libdir -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 16435 Dec 25 19:25:37 2019 patch-gcc-freebsd-mips -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 204 Dec 25 19:25:37 2019 xtoolchain.mk.in It also needs patch-clang-vec_step (or some equivalent) for powerpc and powerpc64 targeting to compile via clang, because of clang reserving the vec_step identifier and the gcc source code using that identifier. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) _______________________________________________ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: devel/freebsd-gcc9@powerpc (for example) : it has the clang vs. gcc vec_step name conflict (for powerpc families): build fails under clang
Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain Thu, 26 Dec 2019 16:06:21 -0800
- devel/freebsd-gcc9@powerpc (for example... Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain
- Re: devel/freebsd-gcc9@powerpc (fo... Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain
- Re: devel/freebsd-gcc9@powerpc (fo... Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: devel/freebsd-gcc9@powerpc... Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain
- Re: devel/freebsd-gcc9@pow... John Baldwin
- Re: devel/freebsd-gcc9... Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain