On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 09:33:42AM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 14:03, Alfredo Dal Ava Junior > <alfredo.jun...@eldorado.org.br> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm working on having PowerPC64 using LLVM by default, but LLD support for > > 32 bit seems to be incomplete. As workaround I'm using ld.bfd (2.17) for > > the LIB32 step. > > Ok - eventual goal should be to have 32- and 64-bit linked with lld, > but I have no objection to an interim step that uses ld.bfd 2.17.50 > for the 32-bit build. Note that there's a goal of removing GCC 4.2.1 > and binutils 2.17.50 (requiring external toolchain for architectures > that have not migrated to clang/lld).
If need by, we can add an XLIB32LD. -- Brooks
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
