(Moved from -current to -ports) On 27 March 2018 at 13:15, Ed Maste <ema...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Fair enough - this was the reason I sent the email. I've now gone > through and submitted a PR for for each failure that did not already > have one. I've also added LLD_UNSAFE to a few ports where where it was > straightforward.
Via tobik's commit to lang/myrddin (r465725) I discovered BINARY_ALIAS=ld=ld.bfd, which is a usable workaround for some ports which don't honour $LD or -fuse-ld=bfd in CFLAGS. As you point out in reply to my r465755 BINARY_ALIAS alone is not sufficient, because arm64 does not provide ld.bfd by default and LLD_UNSAFE automatically brings in ports binutils if /usr/bin/ld.bfd does not exist. So we need both LLD_UNSAFE and BINARY_ALIAS. Should we just have LLD_UNSAFE also set BINARY_ALIAS=ld=ld.bfd? _______________________________________________ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
