https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215193
David Chisnall <thera...@freebsd.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |thera...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #2 from David Chisnall <thera...@freebsd.org> ---
I think that a better solution to this would be more frequent upstream imports
into base (which should become a lot easier to push to users once we have
packaged base). Making libc++ a private library would mean that it would not
be possible for users to compile C++ programs without installing a port, which
would be a major regression. If we did that, then there's little point having
a C++ compiler in the base system at all.
Libc++ aims to be backwards binary compatible, and so there shouldn't be any
POLA violations from installing a newer one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
